The court ruled that submitting a reply in the form GST-DRC-06 is not mandatory under Section 73(9), 74(9), and 76(3) of the GST Act. Additionally, the court emphasized that a reply sent through postal means should also be considered valid.
The recent ruling by the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the matter of M/s. Great Heights Developers LLP v. Additional Commissioner Office of the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Chennai [Writ Petition No. 1324 of 2024 dated February 01, 2024], marks a significant development in the realm of tax law.
more reasonable timeframe of 3 months for the assessee to make the payment. If the payment was not completed within this extended period, the revenue authority retained the right to initiate recovery proceedings.
The Patna High Court has clarified that the direct invocation of Article 226 of the Constitution of India is impermissible when a taxpayer neglects to file a statutory appeal under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act (CGST).
Form DRC-03 for ITC Reversal: High Court Mandates Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) Re-Credit
Refusing a refund application for unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the grounds of deficiency without proper communication is impermissible by the department.